Guías bioéticas para el desempeño profesional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6858407Palabras clave:
bioética, desempeño profesional, investigación, saludResumen
En este artículo, revisaremos 3 documentos que son fundamentales para la realización de investigaciones en salud: la Declaración Universal sobre Bioética de la UNESCO, las Directrices éticas internacionales para investigaciones relacionadas con la salud que involucran a seres humanos de la CIOMS, y la Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM. Estos documentos pretenden ofrecer una guía sobre los aspectos éticos que deben tenerse en cuenta para llevar a cabo estudios que involucren seres humanos.
Descargas
Referencias
Askitopoulou H, Vgontzas AN. The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times [Internet]. Vol. 27, European Spine Journal. Springer Verlag; 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. p. 1481–90. A vailable from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29080001/
Indla V, Radhika M. Hippocratic oath: Losing relevance in today’s world? Indian Journal of Psychiatry [Internet]. 2019 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Nov 21];61(10):S773–5. A vailable from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31040472/
Askitopoulou H, Vgontzas AN. The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath— t oday’s perspective [Internet]. Vol. 27, European Spine Journal. Springer Verlag; 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. p. 1491–500. A vailable from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29786117/
American Medical Association: Code of medical ethics [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 21]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/code-medical-ethics-overview
Markman JR, Markman M. Running an ethical trial 60 years after the Nuremberg Code. Lancet Oncology [Internet]. 2007 Dec [cited 2020 Nov 21];8(12):1139–46. A vailable from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18054883/
UNESCO: Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. Available from: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
UNESCO. Ethics Education Programme. Bioethic Core Currculum. 2008. 71
Langlois A. The UNESCO Bioethics Programme: A review. New Bioethics [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 May 29];20(1):3–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24979873/
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights [Internet]. UNESCO. 2005 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/bioethics-and-human-rights
Langlois A. The UNESCO Bioethics Programme: A review. New Bioethics [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 23];20(1):3–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24979873/
Donders Y. Do cultural diversity and human rights make a good match? International Social Science Journal [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2020 Dec 23];61(199):15–35. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132940/
United Nations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights [Internet]. 1948 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Constitution of the World Health Organization [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution
Langlois A. The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Perspectives from Kenya and South Africa. Health Care Analysis [Internet]. 2008 Mar [cited 2020 Dec 23];16(1):39–51. Available from: http s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18240025/
Faunce TA. The UNESCO Bioethics Declaration “social responsibility” principle and cost-effectiveness price evaluations for essential medicines. Monash bioethics review [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Dec 23];24(3):10–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16302317/
Andorno R. Global bioethics at UNESCO: In defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2007 Mar [cited 2020 Dec 23];33(3):150–4. Available from: http s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17329385/
Selgelid MJ. Universal norms and conflicting values [Internet]. Vol. 5, Developing World Bioethics. Dev World Bioeth; 2005 [cited 2020 Dec 23]. p. 267–73. A vailable from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16128858/
Shah AK, Warsh J, Kesselheim AS. The ethics of intellectual property rights in an era of globalization. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Dec 23];41(4):841–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24446942/
Ashcroft RE. Incentives, nudges and the burden of proof in ethical argument [Internet]. Vol. 43, Journal of Medical Ethics. BMJ Publishing Group; 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 23]. p. 137– 137. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28228496/
Brown RCH. Social values and the corruption argument against financial incentives for healthy behaviour. Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2020 Dec 23];43(3):140– 4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27738254/
Salako SE. The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Protecting future generations and the quest for a global consensus. Medicine and Law [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2020 Dec 23];27(4):805–23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19202858/
Kumar R. Rio Declaration: Global peace – A prerequisite for attainment of sustainable development goals. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 23];8(1):5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911473/
UNESCO Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13178&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Resnik DB. The precautionary principle and medical decision making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy [Internet]. 2004 Jun [cited 2020 Dec 23];29(3):281–99. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15512973/
Rippe KP, Willemsen A. The idea of precaution: Ethical requirements for the regulation of new biotechnologies in the environmental field [Internet]. Vol. 871, Frontiers in Plant Science. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30622545/
Buckeridge J. Environmental ethics: An overview, assessing the place of bioscientists in society, supplemented with selected Australian perspectives [Internet]. Vol. 9, Integrative Zoology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. p. 14– 23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24447658/
Pentreath RJ. Ethics, genetics and dynamics: An emerging systematic approach to radiation protection of the environment. In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity [Internet]. J Environ Radioact; 2004 [cited 2020 Dec 24]. p. 19– 30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15063533/
Taylor B, Chapron G, Kopnina H, Orlikowska E, Gray J, Piccolo JJ. The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2020 Dec 24];34(5):1089– 96. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32424955/
Karlsson M, Edvardsson Björnberg K. Ethics and biodiversity offsetting. Conservation Biology [Internet]. 2020 Oct 8 [cited 2020 Dec 24];cobi.13603. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32757221/
Malik AY, Foster C. The revised Declaration of Helsinki: cosmetic or real change? [Internet]. Vol. 109, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 18]. p. 184– 9. from: /pmc/articles/PMC4872207/?report=abstract
Tollman SM, Bastian H, Doll R, Hirsch LJ, Guess HA. What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki? BMJ [Internet]. 2001 Dec 15 [cited 2020 Nov 18];323(7326):1417– 23. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121866/
Lurie P, Wolfe SM. Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 1997 Sep 18 [cited 2020 Nov 18];337(12):853– 6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9295246/
Association WM. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [Internet]. Vol. 310, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 18]. p. 2191– 4. Available from: www.jama.com
Macklin R. The Declaration of Helsinki: Another revision. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2020 Nov 19];6(1):2– 4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19241946/
Dal-Ré R, Jha V, Lv J, Chaudhury RR, Wang Y, Perkovic V. International trials in middle-income countries: Different local scenarios require different ethical approaches. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine [Internet]. 2016 Feb 1 [cited 2020 Nov 19];109(2):47–51. Available from: ht tps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26432816/
Hurst SA. Declaration of Helsinki and protection for vulnerable research participants [Internet]. Vol. 311, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2014 [cited 2020 Nov 19]. p. 1252. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24668113/
Foster C, Malik AY. The elephant in the (board) room: The role of contract research organizations in international clinical research. American Journal of Bioethics [Internet]. 2012 Nov [cited 2020 Nov 19];12(11):49–50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23072682/
Ndebele P. The Declaration of Helsinki, 50 years later [Internet]. Vol. 310, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA; 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 19]. p. 2145–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24141794/
Sofaer N, Thiessen C, Goold SD, Ballou J, Getz KA, Koski G, et al. Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: Qualitative results from the experiences of participants in clinical trials (EPIC) study. Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2009 Mar [cited 2020 Nov 19];35(3):183– 8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19251971/
Shaffer DN, Yebei VN, Ballidawa JB, Sidle JE, Greene JY, Meslin EM, et al. Equitable treatment for HIV/AIDS clinical trial participants: A focus group study of patients, clinician researchers, and administrators in western Kenya. Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2006 Jan [cited 2020 Nov 19];32(1):55–60. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16373525/
Lavery J v., Green SK, Bandewar SVS, Bhan A, Daar A, Emerson CI, et al. Addressing ethical, social, and cultural issues in global health research. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 21];7(8):e2227. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23951371/
Schwan B. Responsibility amid the social determinants of health. Bioethics [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 21]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32588451/
United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Data (1990-2018) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 20]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Alcides Chaux (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los artículos publicados en la Revista UniNorte de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud se distribuyen bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Esta licencia permite a cualquier usuario copiar, distribuir, adaptar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercial, siempre que se otorgue el crédito adecuado a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación.
La reutilización del contenido deberá reconocer la autoría, citar la fuente original e indicar si se han realizado modificaciones.
