Predominant symptoms in hospitalized adult patients with dengue: a descriptive literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21741403Keywords:
dengue, clinical manifestations, hospitalization, adults, literature reviewAbstract
Introduction: Dengue remains one of the arboviral diseases with the greatest public health impact and presents a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from self-limited febrile illness to severe forms requiring hospitalization. In adults, clinical expression may be heterogeneous and hinder timely case recognition, especially during outbreaks or in high-demand care settings.
Objective: To describe the predominant symptoms reported in hospitalized adult patients with a dengue diagnosis based on nine Spanish-language studies included in this review.
Materials and methods: A descriptive literature review was conducted. The search included Spanish-language articles located in SciELO and Google Scholar. Studies of hospitalized patients diagnosed with dengue that reported clinical manifestations were considered, and works focused on pediatric populations were excluded. Nine articles were selected, from which country, institution, population assessed, sex predominance, and main clinical symptoms were extracted.
Results: The nine included studies came from Cuba, Paraguay, Venezuela, Colombia, and Honduras. Female sex predominated in most series. Fever was the most consistent finding and appeared in 100% of cases in several studies, although one Paraguayan series reported it in 84% and another in 87.38%. Headache showed frequencies ranging from 52% to 88.9%. Myalgias ranged from 60.2% to 89.9%, while retro-ocular or retro-orbital pain was observed in approximately 63% to 72.6%. Arthralgias, asthenia, anorexia, rash, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and malaise were also described.
Conclusions: Fever was the predominant symptom in hospitalized adults with dengue, followed by headache, myalgias, and retro-ocular pain, in a context of clinical variability across series and countries that requires interpreting these findings as a descriptive synthesis rather than a uniform measure of frequency.
Downloads
References
Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12060
Horstick O, Martinez E, Guzman MG, Martin JL, Ranzinger SR. WHO dengue case classification 2009 and its usefulness in practice: an expert consensus in the Americas. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(1):19-25. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000003
Tsheten T, Clements ACA, Gray DJ, Adhikary RK, Wangdi K. Clinical predictors of severe dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-021-00908-2
Kosasih H, Alisjahbana B, Nurhayati N, de Mast Q, Parwati I, Basuki PS, et al. The epidemiology, virology and clinical findings of dengue virus infections in a cohort of Indonesian adults in Western Java. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(2):e0004390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004390
Woon YL, Hor CP, Hussin N, Zakaria Z, Goh PP, Heh CH, et al. A two-year review on epidemiology and clinical characteristics of dengue deaths in Malaysia, 2013-2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(5):e0004575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004575
Bodinayake CK, Tillekeratne LG, Nagahawatte A, Devasiri V, Arachchi WK, Strouse JJ, et al. Evaluation of the WHO 2009 classification for diagnosis of acute dengue in a large cohort of adults and children in Sri Lanka during a dengue-1 epidemic. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006258
Cobas Planchéz L, Navarro García YE, Mezquia de Pedro N. Diagnóstico de dengue en pacientes con síndrome febril inespecífico del Policlínico Docente «Ángel Machaco Ameijeiras», La Habana. Rev Inf Cient. 2020;99(2):115-23.
Cáceres N. Características clínicas de pacientes febriles ambulatorios en el Instituto de Medicina Tropical. Rev Inst Med Trop. 2008;3(2):14-8.
Matta L, Barbosa MM, Morales P, Cristian D. Caracterización clínica de pacientes que consultaron por dengue en un hospital de tercer nivel en Cali, Colombia, 2013. Biomédica. 2016;36(1):133-9.
Fleitas Mendoza EE, Ortiz Ovelar C, Ferreira Gaona MI, Díaz Reissner CV. Caracterización epidemiológica del dengue en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva Adultos. Hospital Central «Dr. Emilio Cubas» del Instituto de Previsión Social, Paraguay. Mem Inst Investig Cienc Salud. 2015;13(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.18004/mem.iics/1812-9528/2015.013(01)31-040
Mejía Verdial DA, Paredes Moreno FA, Mejía Verdial KG, Fúnes de Núñez EC. Caracterización epidemiológica y clínica de pacientes adultos con dengue en la costa Atlántica de Honduras. Rev Méd Hondur. 2021;89(2):103-8. https://doi.org/10.5377/rmh.v89i2.12868
González Fajardo I, Núñez Betancourt A. Caracterización de los pacientes con dengue. Rev Cienc Méd. 2011;15(3):2-14.
Massón LAC, González VGJ, Espinosa ÁRF. Comportamiento clínico y epidemiológico del dengue en el municipio 10 de Octubre. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 2015;31(1):5-16.
García Gómez C, Sánchez Sánchez S, Pantoja Fonseca D, Rodríguez Morales O, Navarro Baldellot A, García Mantecón C. Comportamiento clínico-epidemiológico de pacientes con dengue. Estudio comparativo de dos series de casos. Medisur. 2021;19(3):421-8.
Fuentes G, Carbajales León E, Figueredo González Y. Características clínicas y epidemiológicas en pacientes con diagnóstico de la IgM positiva a dengue. Medimay. 2022;29(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karen Balletbo C., Carlos Héctor Molinas-Duré (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los artículos publicados en la Revista UniNorte de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud se distribuyen bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Esta licencia permite a cualquier usuario copiar, distribuir, adaptar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercial, siempre que se otorgue el crédito adecuado a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación.
La reutilización del contenido deberá reconocer la autoría, citar la fuente original e indicar si se han realizado modificaciones.